Introduction
Drombaya started as a pilot project in summer 2008 through partnering with four Civil Society Organisations (CSOs). In February 2009, it was time for the first field evaluation to monitor the performance and impact. Each CSO was provided with 2000 Euro capital in August 2008 with an annual interest rate of 8%. The repayment date of the loan was set for September 2009.
The evaluation took place between February, 9th and 24th. It was structured into individual meetings with the four organisations and a group meeting of all CSOs during the first week. The second week was committed to meet some borrowers of the organisations. This report summarises the results and observations and looks shortly into the future.
CSO performance
All in all, 162 people received loans from the total capital of 8000 Euro. The average loan size was around 76 Euro whereby the lowest loan was 30 Euro and highest 150 Euro. The duration varied between three and ten months. The average recovery rate is around 95%. The missing five per cent represent late repayments due to illness, birth, fire and other reasons. However, all organisations agreed that these five per cent are very likely to be recovered although late. In average the organisations charged an annual interest rate of 21.25%. It is important to note that this is the interest for one year and doesn’t occur for a six months loan where the average interest rate would be around 11% in average for this period. Comparing the interest rate to profit oriented microfinance organisations, it appears to be very low as they often charge around 45% annually[i]. In contrast, organisations which focus
on the social impact and poverty alleviation like the Grameen bank charge interest rates around 20%. Drombaya can therefore be attributed to the later.
Procedure
After receiving the loan in August 2008, the CSOs started sensitising their women groups in the communities. Then, all organisations besides one carried out business training for all borrowers. The intensity of the business training varied remarkably between a two hours crash course and a two day full time workshop. Confronting the organisations with the question of the necessity of business training, it was concluded that it is very difficult to measure the impact of business training but it is likely to have a minor influence for the performance. However, the one-to-one coaching which takes place at every repayment meeting was regarded to be very important.
After the training and the loan application from the borrower side, the loans were disbursed to the groups. All organisations besides one work with the principle of social collateral which means that group members have to help repaying if one in the group fails to do so. Repayments were either directly collected by the organisation every month or by the treasurer of a group on a weekly or bi-weekly basis. Each organisation presented at the individual meeting during the evaluation their way of keeping paper-based records. These were kept in detail. Subsequent to the paper based documentation, the organisations had to upload their computer based records plus a picture of each borrower to the Drombaya internet platform to give the investors an insight into their creditors’ life. Some of the borrower portraits were then published on the web platform.
The question of impact
Most loans were used to start a small trading business, to increase the quantity of an existing income generating activity or to buy raw material, proceed and sell it. Trade was done with all different kind of things like shoes, tomatoes, carrots, peanuts, etc.
The interesting question comes with how a small loan actually influences the life of a woman. After seven months, it can be observed that in most cases the loans mainly helped to supplement the low income level. According to the organisations, a real transformation from the generated income could occur from an average loan size of 150 Euro. That means double of the current average amount. However, none of the organisations would have started with that size in the beginning as they see it as crucial to build trust through regular repayments with the 75 Euro loan. Once this has been repaid, they will gradually increase the loan size and allow the borrower to step into bigger business. They all agree that if they had started with too big loans, the recovery rate would have been much smaller. Therefore, it will take about two to three years until a borrower reaches the point whereby a real transformation in terms of living standard can be observed.
However, there are some borrowers who could already change their life remarkably through the small 75 Euro loan. An example is Elisabeth who used the whole amount to buy Manioc on the market and processed it into Garry. She could sell it for 225 Euro and made a profit of over 130 Euros. She used part of the money to pay for the school fees of her children and reinvested the rest to buy more Maniocs. Such enormous profits which resulted into a kind of life transformation were the rare cases and could be observed in about 15 cases (around 10%). However, as soon as the loan size increases, this rate is most likely to boost significantly.
Problems
The main difficulty which all organisations encountered was the limited capital basis they had to operate with. The income they could generate through the interest rate is not enough to cover their own expenses and they are consequently losing. In average, an organisation can reach the break-even point with capital of 17’000 Euro.
Secondly, there were some minor problems with the upload to the internet platform due to one mistake on the platform in the beginning.
Future
The current capital basis of 2000 Euro per organisation has been extended until February 2010. However, the main focus of Drombaya will be to sustain the existing organisations during 2009 and provide each of them with capital of 17’000 Euro. This will allow them to break even their costs and to reach about 150 people per year. Moreover, they will be able to provide bigger loans which will consequently have a more transformative impact. In addition, Drombaya as an organisation would be able to cover its basic costs.
Conclusion
The pilot project has been a success so far: 162 loans could be distributed with a capital of 8000 Euro and the recovery rate is higher than expected with 95% in average. Nonetheless, the transformative impact of the loans could only be achieved for about 10% of the current borrowers which is mainly due to the low loan size and the short duration of the project. However, starting with a higher amount per person was likely to fail as the relationship between the person and the organisation has to be developed at first. It is very probable that observable transformation with regards to children at school, housing and meals per day can be observed during the gradual process of increasing loans.
The Drombaya team is convinced that the taken approach works and is committed to establish Drombaya as a social business.
[i] Compare Social Performance Report 2008 from ResponsAbility (p. 11 ), where the average for loan sizes below 500$ is 47%